Site icon Fusion IAS

Indian Express Editorial Analysis: January 14, 2025

Indian Express Editorial Analysis: January 14, 2025
Share It

The Indian Express editorial analysis offers valuable insights into current issues affecting India, providing a critical understanding of socio-political and economic matters. For UPSC CSE preparation, such editorials are essential for developing analytical skills, enhancing understanding of governance, and applying knowledge to relevant General Studies topics. Through editorial analysis, aspirants can engage with contemporary issues, assess policy impacts, and build a nuanced perspective required for the examination.


1. No, legal guarantee for MSP is not a “folly”

Context:

Arguments Supporting Legal MSP:

  1. National Hypocrisy on MSP:
    • MSP is widely appreciated as a concept but resisted when it comes to implementation.
    • Farmers demand the realization of the MSP, which is often only symbolic.
  2. State’s Responsibility:
    • MSP is part of an unwritten social contract between the Indian state and farmers, ensuring fair compensation.
    • Climate change and global competition exacerbate challenges for farmers, necessitating state support.
  3. Economic Viability:
    • Government waivers for corporate taxes (₹1.09 lakh crore) and public sector bank write-offs (₹2.08 lakh crore in 2022-23) reveal the fiscal capacity to support MSP.
    • Ensuring MSP is estimated to cost between ₹26,565 crore (current MSP) and ₹1,68,227 crore (revised MSP with C2+50%), accounting for 0.1% to 0.62% of GDP.
  4. Proposed Mechanisms:
    • Expand Public Distribution System (PDS): Widen the food basket and increase MSP-based procurement.
    • Market Intervention Scheme: Fund targeted programs to prevent price falls below MSP.
    • Import-Export Policy Reforms: Align policies to avoid suppressing domestic prices.
    • Price Deficiency Payments (PDP): Compensate farmers for the gap between market prices and MSP.
  5. Comparison with Other Sectors:
    • Growth in fisheries, poultry, and horticulture is cited against MSP but is unrelated to market-based systems.
    • Crops under MSP like mustard and green gram outpaced horticulture in cumulative growth between 2011-12 and 2022-23.
  6. Improved PDP Models:
    • Learning from failures like Madhya Pradesh’s Bhavantar scheme, more robust models like Haryana’s Price Deficiency Payment scheme (bajra) can be adopted, compensating farmers based on area sown, productivity, and price deficit.

Counterarguments to Criticism:

  1. Ashok Gulati’s Position:
    • Gulati opposes legal MSP, citing market distortions and the promotion of collusion.
    • Yadav argues that MSP doesn’t inherently impede price discovery and is critical for balancing government interventions that suppress farmer income.
  2. Free-Market Ideology:
    • Farmers need assured MSP as free-market systems fail to address the inherent consumer bias and price suppression in India’s agricultural policies.

Conclusion:


2. India’s growth slowdown is a signal of declining confidence in government


3. What happens when people read to be ‘hurt’

The opinion by a professor and writer critiques the growing culture of trigger warnings (TW) and its implications for literature, readers, and broader societal trends. Here’s a breakdown of the key arguments and their relevance:

1. Trigger Warnings in Literature

  • Definition and Purpose:
    • Trigger warnings are labels placed before texts to prepare readers for potentially distressing content.
    • Seen as a form of reader-response criticism, it aligns with the contemporary need for protectionism, particularly among upper-class audiences.
  • Concerns Raised:
    • Trigger warnings impose a prescriptive lens, limiting how readers experience and interpret literature.
    • They are akin to reducing complex narratives into sanitized or paraphrased summaries, undermining literary engagement.
  • Cultural Critique:
    • The author juxtaposes the antiseptic environment enabled by TWs with the raw realities faced by characters like Draupadi (from Mahabharata) or Dopdi Mejhen (from Mahasweta Devi’s Draupadi).
    • Such warnings appear incongruous in contexts where resilience against unanticipated hardships is essential.

2. Literature as a Catalyst for Action

  • Activism Through Literature:
    • Literature inherently provokes emotional and intellectual responses, often inspiring action or reflection.
    • The classical concept of rasa (art-emotion) encapsulates literature’s ability to evoke deep, transformative experiences.
  • Contrasting “Hurt Sentiments”:
    • Hurt sentiment-driven reactions prioritize group identities over literary intent or value.
    • These responses often stem from misinterpretations or an overly literal approach to texts.

3. The Phenomenon of Hurt Sentiments

  • Hurt Sentiments vs. Trigger Warnings:
    • While TWs cater to individual sensitivities, hurt sentiments reflect group-based grievances.
    • Both can result in the codification and restriction of creative expression, transforming literature into a battlefield of interpretations.
  • Examples of Misplaced Offense:
    • Legal complaints against writers for perceived insults (e.g., calling priests “dacoits”) reveal how literature becomes a target for censorship or legal action.
    • The satirical comparison to Lord Krishna being called a “thief” highlights the absurdity of selective outrage.

4. Implications for Literature and Society

  • Potential Consequences:
    • Over-regulation through Hurt Sentiment-Proof (HSP) marks or genre classifications like “Hurt Sentiment Literature” risks trivializing literary creativity.
    • Readers may seek out works to affirm biases or grievances, undermining the broader purpose of literature.
  • Deeper Concerns:
    • A society increasingly reliant on warnings and censorship may lose its ability to confront challenging ideas or realities.
    • The disappearance of group identity due to cultural or literary homogenization can lead to a sense of disorientation and impoverishment.

5. Key Takeaways

  • Literature’s Role:
    • Literature’s strength lies in its capacity to challenge, provoke, and sometimes unsettle readers.
    • Attempting to preemptively shield readers from discomfort risks diluting this essence.
  • Cultural Reflection:
    • The rise of trigger warnings and hurt sentiment-based critiques signals a shift toward an overly cautious, protective cultural ethos.
    • Balancing respect for individual sensitivities with preserving the integrity of literary exploration remains critical.

This debate resonates deeply with questions about freedom of expression, censorship, and the role of literature in society—all of which are highly relevant for critical thinking and essay writing in the context of UPSC CSE preparation.


Disclaimer:
This analysis is based on the editorial content published in Indian Express and is intended solely for informational and educational purposes. The views, opinions, and interpretations expressed herein are those of the author of original article. Readers are encouraged to refer to the original article for complete context and to exercise their own judgment while interpreting the analysis. The analysis does not constitute professional advice or endorsement of any political, economic, or social perspective.


Follow Fusion IAS

Telegram

Youtube

Twitter/X

Exit mobile version