Site icon Fusion IAS

The Hindu Editorial Analysis: January 16, 2025

The Hindu Editorial Analysis: January 16, 2025
Share It

The Hindu editorials are a crucial resource for understanding key national and international issues. This analysis simplifies complex topics, highlights key points, and offers critical insights, making it an essential tool for competitive exam preparation like UPSC CSE and developing a well-rounded perspective on current affairs.


1. OYO’s new policy may be at the cost of rights

  1. Policy Announcement:
    • OYO has implemented a policy disallowing unmarried couples from accessing its partner hotels.
    • Couples must provide “valid proof of relationship” to check in.
    • Initially applicable in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, with potential expansion to other cities.
    • OYO claims the policy stems from requests by civil society groups.
  2. Impact of the Policy:
    • Encourages partner hotels to discriminate against customers based on marital status.
    • Likely to exacerbate privacy issues faced by individuals in pre-marital relationships.
    • Affects not only unmarried couples but also friends, colleagues, or relatives traveling together.
  3. Constitutional Perspective:
    • Article 21: Supreme Court rulings affirm individuals’ rights to privacy, dignity, and autonomy, including:
      • The right to choose partners (Shafin Jahan vs Asokan K.M., 2020).
      • The right to companionship (Navtej Singh Johar vs Union of India, 2018).
    • Denying hotel services may impede the exercise of these rights.
  4. Vertical vs Horizontal Application of Rights:
    • Fundamental rights under Part III of the Constitution are enforceable primarily against the State (“vertical” application).
    • Rights against private entities (“horizontal” application) are limited but evolving.
  5. Relevant Constitutional Provisions:
    • Article 15(2): Prohibits discrimination in access to public services based on religion, race, caste, sex, etc., but does not explicitly include marital status.
    • Article 17: Abolishes untouchability.
    • Article 23: Prohibits human trafficking and forced labor.
    • Kaushal Kishor vs State of Uttar Pradesh (2023): Recognized the enforcement of Article 21 against private parties, though its applicability remains unclear.
  6. Legislative Gaps:
    • Need for anti-discrimination laws to protect individuals from biases based on marital status, gender, sexual orientation, or other attributes in the private sphere.
    • Existing statutes confer rights to women irrespective of marital status, but broader protections are lacking.
  7. Social and Legal Implications:
    • Private entities, like OYO, play a role in enabling or hindering the exercise of constitutional rights.
    • Discrimination in private spheres (e.g., renting homes, employment, land purchases) highlights the “tyranny of the majority.”
    • Legal protections must ensure the freedom to act within constitutional guarantees, regardless of societal approval.
  8. Conclusion:
    • The policy raises critical questions about balancing societal norms with constitutional rights.
    • Advocates stress the importance of creating legal frameworks to safeguard individual autonomy and equality in private transactions.

2. ​Safety and piety: On safety and religious pilgrimage sites


3. The red flag as China’s expansionist strategy rolls on


4. Burrow tragedy: On the coal mining tragedy in Assam’s Dima Hasao

  1. Incident Overview:
    • A coal mining tragedy in Dima Hasao, Assam, has resulted in four deaths, highlighting the dangers of rat-hole mining.
    • Rat-hole mining involves unscientific and unsafe manual techniques to extract coal, often posing significant risks of flooding, as suspected in this incident.
  2. Rat-hole Mining Hazards:
    • Health and Safety Risks: High probability of tunnel collapses and sudden flooding from hidden aquifers.
    • Child Labor: Rat-hole mining often involves children, exposing them to hazardous working conditions.
    • Environmental Impact: Causes deforestation, water contamination, and ecological degradation.
  3. Regulations and Ban:
    • The National Green Tribunal (NGT) banned rat-hole mining in 2014 due to its unsafe and unsustainable nature.
    • The Supreme Court, in 2019, questioned the role of local officials in enabling illegal mining activities despite the ban.
  4. Factors Sustaining Illegal Mining:
    • Economic Demand: Rat-hole mining persists due to the demand for coal in cement and thermal power plants, particularly in the Northeast.
    • Lack of Enforcement: Illegal mining continues, aided by poor administrative oversight and possible collusion of local authorities.
    • Economic Viability: Mechanized mining and proper geological surveys would make such mining operations economically unfeasible.
  5. Government and Legal Oversight:
    • Assam’s Chief Minister acknowledged that the mine in question appeared illegal and abandoned by the State Mines and Minerals Department.
    • Previous instances of using rat-hole miners as a last resort (e.g., 2023 Uttarkashi rescue operations) reveal the normalization of these unsafe practices.
  6. Recurring Tragedies and Amnesia:
    • Mining disasters like the 2018 East Jaintia Hills tragedy (15 trapped miners) show the cyclical nature of such incidents.
    • A lack of decisive action perpetuates the risks, with each tragedy fading into public memory until the next disaster.
  7. Way Forward:
    • Strict Enforcement: Strengthen oversight mechanisms to prevent illegal mining operations.
    • Puncture Economic Incentives: Tackle demand through alternate energy sources and promote sustainable mining practices.
    • Technological Intervention: Invest in mechanized and modern mining techniques where feasible.
    • Awareness and Accountability: Ensure accountability of local officials and educate stakeholders about the risks of rat-hole mining.
    • Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Align mining practices with SDGs, focusing on environmental preservation, health, and safety.
  8. Conclusion:
    The Dima Hasao tragedy underscores the urgent need for systemic reforms in India’s mining sector. Without decisive action, India risks recurring disasters, compromising human lives and the environment for short-term economic gains.

Also Read: The Hindu Editorial Analysis: January 14, 2025

Disclaimer:
This analysis is based on the editorial content published in The Hindu and is intended solely for informational and educational purposes. The views, opinions, and interpretations expressed herein are those of the author of original article. Readers are encouraged to refer to the original article for complete context and to exercise their own judgment while interpreting the analysis. The analysis does not constitute professional advice or endorsement of any political, economic, or social perspective.


Follow Fusion IAS

Telegram

Youtube

Twitter/X

Exit mobile version